SkipCaptcha
67
edits
Changes
Major re-write (very 'first-draft' tho: still thinking about the 'political' senses)
'''Equity''' is the law that developed in [[England]] in the [[Court of Chancery]] prior to 1873 (at which point the [[Judicature Act]] gave the courts jurisdiction in both common law and equity). It developed largely as a reaction to the strict rules enforced in the [[common law]] courts. Although initially more flexible than the common law (thus prompting the famous remark by [[John Selden]] that “Equity varies with the length of the Chancellor’s foot”) equity has become more fixed over time.
'''Equity''' has at least three specific meanings: ''financial'' and ''legal'' meanings, both of long standing, and a relatively new but increasingly often-seen (albeit much vaguer) family of ''political'' meanings. What all three senses have in common is connoting ''fairness'' in some way or other. By far, the most frequently encountered sense is the financial one, denoting a holding of stock or shares in a company, and some at least of the family of political usages are derived from that sense (see below), often in contrast with ''equality''.
In the legal sense, ''Equity'' is the law that developed in [[England]] in the [[Court of Chancery]] prior to 1873 (at which point the [[Judicature Act]] gave the courts jurisdiction in both common law and equity). It developed largely as a reaction to the strict rules enforced in the [[common law]] courts. Although initially more flexible than the common law (thus prompting the famous remark by [[John Selden]] that “Equity varies with the length of the Chancellor’s foot”) equity has become more fixed over time.
In the [[United States]] the [[Federal government]] and most of the [[State government]]s have merged their equitable and common law courts. But principles of '''equity''' remain very important in many legal doctrines, such distinguishing when a [[plaintiff]] has a right to a jury under the [[U.S. Constitution]].
In the [[United States]] the [[Federal government]] and most of the [[State government]]s have merged their equitable and common law courts. But principles of '''equity''' remain very important in many legal doctrines, such distinguishing when a [[plaintiff]] has a right to a jury under the [[U.S. Constitution]].
In a business context, ''equity'' financing is one of two principle ways for a company to finance (raise money for) an investment; the other is ''debt'' financing - borrowing money at interest. Rather than borrow the money, the directors can decide to issue (ie sell) newly-created shares in the company. The money raised belongs immediately to the company itself and does not have to be repaid (although it is possible for the company later to ''buy-back'' shares at the prevailing market price, thereby effectively reversing the process). The new investors in the company therefore surrender their money indefinitely; what they get in return is a proportionate share in the ownership, control and subsequent profits of the company. In particular, each is entitled to an ''equal'' share of the profits corresponding to the proportion of shares held: every share is of equal worth, hence ''equity''. (There are, however, devices like eg special shares, or even so-called 'golden shares', that can compromise this principle - for example, by granting shareholders a profit-share without sharing control. Such shares are of lesser value, inevitably, but the lower cost can attract 'silent' investors who are uninterested in influencing how the business is actually run.)
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Law]]