Difference between revisions of "Carbon offset"
(clean up, plus I couldn't find anything in the source to back up the 95/5 statement) |
m (been here for a month, move to talk) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
It is estimated that in the first three quarters of 2006, about 130 million dollars were spent offseting the carbon emissions of companies and individuals, a 300 per cent increase over from 2005 <ref>http://www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/carbon_neutral_myth.pdf</ref>. The companies marketing the carbon offset credits are unregulated and lack transparency of where the money for offsets is spend. | It is estimated that in the first three quarters of 2006, about 130 million dollars were spent offseting the carbon emissions of companies and individuals, a 300 per cent increase over from 2005 <ref>http://www.carbontradewatch.org/pubs/carbon_neutral_myth.pdf</ref>. The companies marketing the carbon offset credits are unregulated and lack transparency of where the money for offsets is spend. | ||
| − | + | ==See Also== | |
| − | |||
| − | ==See | ||
*[[Carbon sequestration]] - the act of preventing [[carbon dioxide]] from a process to mix with the [[atmosphere]] | *[[Carbon sequestration]] - the act of preventing [[carbon dioxide]] from a process to mix with the [[atmosphere]] | ||
Revision as of 02:48, January 4, 2008
Carbon offseting is the practice of purchasing or building carbon sinks which match or exceed an individual or corporation's carbon dioxide emmissions. Carbon offset activities could include buying stocks in a "green" power company, using solar power, and the like. The goal is to keep an individual or corporation's net carbon emissions at zero, in order to stave off the theoretical warming due to the greenhouse effect.
Critics point out that, while carbon dioxide has the largest volume of controllable contributions to theorized atmospheric warming, it has the lowest effect on a per molecule basis of any of the greenhouse gases.
It is important to note that, while planting trees is percieved to be a "green" activity, a simple balance over the life and death of the tree will show that this activity does not actually decrease carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. While carbon is consumed by the tree during growth, the exact same amount of carbon is produced during decomposition. The net carbon gain, therefore, is zero over the entire lifecycle of the tree.
Some politicians and activists, particularly environmental activists such as Al Gore use carbon offsetting as a status symbol within their community.
It is estimated that in the first three quarters of 2006, about 130 million dollars were spent offseting the carbon emissions of companies and individuals, a 300 per cent increase over from 2005 [1]. The companies marketing the carbon offset credits are unregulated and lack transparency of where the money for offsets is spend.
See Also
- Carbon sequestration - the act of preventing carbon dioxide from a process to mix with the atmosphere