Difference between revisions of "Talk:SNCC"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Can I see some evidence for the 'fact' that they were a Marxist Leninist group? I had an Uncle who was involved in this group, and he was no Commie. ~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Can I see some evidence for the 'fact' that they were a Marxist Leninist group? I had an Uncle who was involved in this group, and he was no Commie. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 15:41, 13 December 2007 (EST)
 
Can I see some evidence for the 'fact' that they were a Marxist Leninist group? I had an Uncle who was involved in this group, and he was no Commie. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 15:41, 13 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
P.S- Although they unfortunately fell in with the Black nationalist movement, Snick had its roots firmly lodged in fighting the Jim Crow laws of the 1960s. I hope you are only a parodist here to take the mick, but Snick, at least in their foundation, were not a Marxist group, and there is no evidence to support such a wholly false claim. [[User:ModerateCatholic|ModerateCatholic]] 15:44, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 20:44, December 13, 2007

Can I see some evidence for the 'fact' that they were a Marxist Leninist group? I had an Uncle who was involved in this group, and he was no Commie. ModerateCatholic 15:41, 13 December 2007 (EST)

P.S- Although they unfortunately fell in with the Black nationalist movement, Snick had its roots firmly lodged in fighting the Jim Crow laws of the 1960s. I hope you are only a parodist here to take the mick, but Snick, at least in their foundation, were not a Marxist group, and there is no evidence to support such a wholly false claim. ModerateCatholic 15:44, 13 December 2007 (EST)