nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: +
Conservapedia talk:Editing etiquette (view source)
Revision as of 06:40, December 16, 2007
, 06:40, December 16, 2007→My reversion of Alexjohnc3's edits: Response to Alexjohnc3
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:11, 4 November 2007 (EST)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:11, 4 November 2007 (EST)
:I doubt every single "secular" geologist believes Earth is over a billion years old. There's probably a few who believe that the world doesn't actually exist and is really just a simulation, just as there are some Creationist geologists. I didn't mean to be offensive, but you might as well have said, "secular evilutionists believe the world is 4.5 billion years old and that we're all monkeys!" Putting the world "secular" before words like "geologist," "scientist," etc. is a technique often used to imply that scientists don't have actual reasons for accepting the validity of a view. [[User:Alexjohnc3|Alexjohnc3]] 18:11, 15 December 2007 (EST)
:I doubt every single "secular" geologist believes Earth is over a billion years old. There's probably a few who believe that the world doesn't actually exist and is really just a simulation, just as there are some Creationist geologists. I didn't mean to be offensive, but you might as well have said, "secular evilutionists believe the world is 4.5 billion years old and that we're all monkeys!" Putting the world "secular" before words like "geologist," "scientist," etc. is a technique often used to imply that scientists don't have actual reasons for accepting the validity of a view. [[User:Alexjohnc3|Alexjohnc3]] 18:11, 15 December 2007 (EST)
:: I would suggest that there are ''far'' more geologists who who believe that the world is around 6,000 years old than who believe that it doesn't exist. That's little more than a red herring. And how is what I said equivalent to calling someone "evil"? As for why the word secular is put there, on the contrary, it's not to imply that they don't have actual reasons, but to imply that their reasons are based on ideology rather than facts. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 01:40, 16 December 2007 (EST)
== Protection.... ==
== Protection.... ==
Since this page is linked to throughout Conservapedia, I have protected it from general editing. That does not mean who don't encourage suggested changes! It does mean it needs to be protected from potential vandals and mischief makers. Please post your suggestions for inclusion here, and an Administrator will be happy to open it for you, or discuss your ideas here. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:25, 4 November 2007 (EST)
Since this page is linked to throughout Conservapedia, I have protected it from general editing. That does not mean who don't encourage suggested changes! It does mean it needs to be protected from potential vandals and mischief makers. Please post your suggestions for inclusion here, and an Administrator will be happy to open it for you, or discuss your ideas here. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:25, 4 November 2007 (EST)