5
edits
Changes
h
:: Thanks for answering. Only is Deuteronomy the old testamony. And since the learnings of the N.T. the O.T. is no longer valueble. Paul speaks in the N.T. about false prophets in the meaning of liers. Not of persons whose prophecies (like Nostradamus) are not coming out.[[User:Dolittle|Dolittle]] 15:52, 28 December 2007 (EST)
:: Thanks for answering. Only is Deuteronomy the old testamony. And since the learnings of the N.T. the O.T. is no longer valueble. Paul speaks in the N.T. about false prophets in the meaning of liers. Not of persons whose prophecies (like Nostradamus) are not coming out.[[User:Dolittle|Dolittle]] 15:52, 28 December 2007 (EST)
:::I personally don't believe that the NT negates the OT. See [http://www.messianic.com/articles/nt-law.htm] [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:55, 28 December 2007 (EST)
:::I personally don't believe that the NT negates the OT. See [http://www.messianic.com/articles/nt-law.htm] [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:55, 28 December 2007 (EST)
::The N.T. is only a book (I am not christian). [b]Therefore it only matters what believers are believing[/b]. The story of Jezus and the righ man who wanted to follow Jezus is by the way a GREAT example that the O.T. has no value anymore ("But I follow all laws of Mozes". "But do you love your near ones (I am Dutch) like your self so sell anything you own". story: And the righ one leaved very disappointed. So since the N.T. "love" is what matters and no silly rules to murder "false" prophecers. (However that does not include my financial adviser who told the share Randstad whould most valueble) [[User:Dolittle|Dolittle]] 16:05, 28 December 2007 (EST)