281
edits
Changes
→How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact?
Evolution is the accepted theory in the scientific community because it is a falsifiable theory. Something Creationism is not. Moreover, it is as valid as any other currently accepted scientific theory. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 22:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is the accepted theory in the scientific community because it is a falsifiable theory. Something Creationism is not. Moreover, it is as valid as any other currently accepted scientific theory. [[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 22:14, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Evolution is a valid theory, and I know this. It is not a good theory though. I give it as an example of a theory that does not have a good solid base of fact into which it can support itself. The theory of the flying spaghetti monster is a valid theory also. it's just not a very good one. ~~---
Evolution is a valid theory, and I know this. It is not a good theory though. I give it as an example of a theory that does not have a good solid base of fact into which it can support itself. The theory of the flying spaghetti monster is a valid theory also. it's just not a very good one. --[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 22:21, 14 March 2007 (EDT)