1,193
edits
Changes
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 01:36, January 25, 2008
, 01:36, January 25, 2008→Recent quote
:::::: Well, what would you consider a less arbitrary cutoff point? Nine? Eight? Seven? Six? Five? Four? Three? Two? One? Seriously, having a more recent quote in the article can't be a bad thing. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:44, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::::: Well, what would you consider a less arbitrary cutoff point? Nine? Eight? Seven? Six? Five? Four? Three? Two? One? Seriously, having a more recent quote in the article can't be a bad thing. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:44, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::::::: I wouldn't specify a cutoff point. If you have an appropriate quote from more recently, feel free to add it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:34, 24 January 2008 (EST)
::::::: I wouldn't specify a cutoff point. If you have an appropriate quote from more recently, feel free to add it. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:34, 24 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::: So you're suggesting you'd be perfectly fine adding quotes from any time period? I don't have any; I'm not arguing for the non-existance of transitional forms. If "Many scientists have admitted the lack of transitional fossils.", it shouldn't be terribly difficult to find something from this century, should it? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 20:36, 24 January 2008 (EST)