nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 07:22, January 26, 2008
, 07:22, January 26, 2008→Recent quote: Evidence of creation gaining ground.
:::::::::: I don't really think they've been gaining ground, but eh, if you say so/claim there's a conspiracy against non-scientific beliefs being passed off as science, that's your right. As for the quotes, I'm just saying that a more recent one would make the article more up to date, and not like outdated ramblings.
:::::::::: I don't really think they've been gaining ground, but eh, if you say so/claim there's a conspiracy against non-scientific beliefs being passed off as science, that's your right. As for the quotes, I'm just saying that a more recent one would make the article more up to date, and not like outdated ramblings.
:::::::::: Oh, and this century is eight years old. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::::: Oh, and this century is eight years old. [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 15:46, 25 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::::: 45 years ago there were almost no creationist organisations, and now there are quite a few. 40 years ago we didn't have science magazines publishing articles about what was wrong with creationism. 30 years ago the anti-creationist group NSCE hadn't started. Creationism is definitely gaining ground. I've said umpteen times that I don't claim there to be a conspiracy (a group of people plotting to suppress something they know to be true), but it is a standard anti-creationist tactic to accuse creationists of claiming that. And how are the existing quotes "outdated" and "ramblings"? Or is that just a throwaway line when you've got no actual criticism?
::::::::::: The century began on 1st January 2001, which is seven years, 25 days ago.
::::::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:22, 26 January 2008 (EST)