Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Amendment Cases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I believe the wording of the article is still a little confusing. It seems you are trying to state that all of the briefs listed under the first two heading ignore the precedents under th...) |
(OK) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I believe the wording of the article is still a little confusing. It seems you are trying to state that all of the briefs listed under the first two heading ignore the precedents under the last heading. But the last two cases cited are from 2001 and 1997, and twelve of the briefs are for cases decided before ''Printz v. United States''. --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 09:40, 26 January 2008 (EST) | I believe the wording of the article is still a little confusing. It seems you are trying to state that all of the briefs listed under the first two heading ignore the precedents under the last heading. But the last two cases cited are from 2001 and 1997, and twelve of the briefs are for cases decided before ''Printz v. United States''. --[[User:Jdellaro|Jdellaro]] 09:40, 26 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Right, it refers to the briefs, not the cases. I'll try to improve. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:03, 26 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:03, January 26, 2008
I believe the wording of the article is still a little confusing. It seems you are trying to state that all of the briefs listed under the first two heading ignore the precedents under the last heading. But the last two cases cited are from 2001 and 1997, and twelve of the briefs are for cases decided before Printz v. United States. --Jdellaro 09:40, 26 January 2008 (EST)
- Right, it refers to the briefs, not the cases. I'll try to improve. Thanks.--Aschlafly 10:03, 26 January 2008 (EST)