1,193
edits
Changes
Talk:Transitional form (view source)
Revision as of 03:29, January 31, 2008
, 03:29, January 31, 2008→Recent quote: Response of doom
::: Furthermore, given that creationists argue for variation within a created 'kind', this would need to be for two distinctly different creatures (i.e. of different created kinds); a smooth transition of intermediates between one type of shark and another type of shark doesn't count.
::: Furthermore, given that creationists argue for variation within a created 'kind', this would need to be for two distinctly different creatures (i.e. of different created kinds); a smooth transition of intermediates between one type of shark and another type of shark doesn't count.
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:46, 29 January 2008 (EST)
::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:46, 29 January 2008 (EST)
::::Logically, if a creature with features ABC and a creature with features ADE are found, and a creature with features ACD is found between them (vertically or horizontally) the natural conclusion is that ACD is some sort of midway. Haha... "kinds"... right, how scientific.
::::You're claiming it's not a conspiracy, were you to claim there's a conspiracy, you'd be A: Wrong and B: Nutty.
::::Indeed, it would be a tricky business to find the entire series-- after all, fossilisation is the exception, not the rule. This isn't helped by the fact that previous ideas of evolutionary chains are constantly discarded, nearly every time a new fossil is unearthed.
::::Also, this century started 1/1/2000.
::::FINAL POINT: If we can't get a quote from this century, can we at least have some sort of counterbalance quote? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 22:29, 30 January 2008 (EST)
== Picture ==
== Picture ==