Changes

289 bytes added ,  02:38, February 17, 2008
Line 458: Line 458:  
::::I would understand that, but it's just called "deceit", not "liberal deceit", right?  Is there some portion of the code or something that I screwed up?  It looks like it's just "deceit."--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:45, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::I would understand that, but it's just called "deceit", not "liberal deceit", right?  Is there some portion of the code or something that I screwed up?  It looks like it's just "deceit."--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 02:45, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::You locked the page without replying.  It seems like you're actively trying to keep the page this way, but can't really defend the assertion that only liberals deceive.  I came to this site because I was not interested in the little vendettas and biases on Wikipedia, but I guess now I see that there is good reason for Wikipedia policies... I regret having helped make a new article with a substantive nature here before discovering that you guys are only interested in being just as bad as the liberals.--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 21:32, 16 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::You locked the page without replying.  It seems like you're actively trying to keep the page this way, but can't really defend the assertion that only liberals deceive.  I came to this site because I was not interested in the little vendettas and biases on Wikipedia, but I guess now I see that there is good reason for Wikipedia policies... I regret having helped make a new article with a substantive nature here before discovering that you guys are only interested in being just as bad as the liberals.--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 21:32, 16 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::::: Nobody said that ''only'' [[liberals]] deceive, but the [[liberal]] ideology does permit and encourage deceit.  Regardless, I've unlocked the page for you but will re-protect it if edits do not comply with the [[rules]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:38, 16 February 2008 (EST)
 +
 
:::Well, [[liberals|who]] do you think are the ones always engaging in [[deceit]]? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 02:53, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
:::Well, [[liberals|who]] do you think are the ones always engaging in [[deceit]]? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 02:53, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::Except that, as I mentioned earlier, it seems pretty silly to claim only liberals deceive.  Conservatives are only human too, even if in general more level-headed.  I mean, take the recent sex scandals in the House.  There was one Republican with pretty good policies who was hitting on a congressional page.  I don't remember his name, but that was fairly strong evidence of deceit.  I think he had a wife!  So I mean, obviously conservatives sometimes deceive, but this article implies that only liberals do.  We want to be conservative, but not just LIE, right?--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 03:00, 15 February 2008 (EST)
 
::::Except that, as I mentioned earlier, it seems pretty silly to claim only liberals deceive.  Conservatives are only human too, even if in general more level-headed.  I mean, take the recent sex scandals in the House.  There was one Republican with pretty good policies who was hitting on a congressional page.  I don't remember his name, but that was fairly strong evidence of deceit.  I think he had a wife!  So I mean, obviously conservatives sometimes deceive, but this article implies that only liberals do.  We want to be conservative, but not just LIE, right?--[[User:GGgg|GGgg]] 03:00, 15 February 2008 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,305

edits