Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(silly cat)
(example added)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* Let's talk about something else!
 
* Let's talk about something else!
 
* I'm not interested in that!
 
* I'm not interested in that!
−
 
+
* After the theft of over half of a [[conservative]] paper's first press run at [[Bucknell University]],[http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=19383118&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=576361&rfi=8] [[liberals]] pretend that it was not ideologically motivated and was not censorship.[[Talk:Main_Page#Bucknell]]
 +
----
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:philosophy]]
 
[[Category:philosophy]]

Revision as of 21:03, March 19, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:


References

  1. ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility here.