Difference between revisions of "Embraced deceit"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Undo revision 402449 by Special:Contributions/DLerner (User talk:DLerner); misleading edit summary so I assume it way subVersive in some way.)
m (Reverted edits by SeeNoEvil (Talk); changed back to last version by DLerner)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
  
'''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].<ref>See a list of examples at [[deceit]].</ref>
+
'''Embraced deceit''' is common.
 
 
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  

Revision as of 19:21, March 10, 2008

Embraced deceit is deceit that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the deceit promote it, but his allies were complicit also.

Embraced deceit is common.

References