Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marriage"
From Conservapedia
(Message for John.) |
DunsScotus (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is Conservapedia, where facts rule. John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | This is Conservapedia, where facts rule. John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! [[User:CEinhorn|CEinhorn]] 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This article doesn't take a strong enough stand on the position that Marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN. (cf. The New York State Supreme Court's decision to ban gay 'marriages' in 2006. [http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/jul/06070601.html]) | ||
Revision as of 19:03, March 23, 2007
As far as I know, when they say "civil marriage," they mean the legal thing that may or may not be between a heterosexual couple (depending on where you live). It's a statement of fact, not opinion. Correct me if I'm wrong. --John 00:12, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
This is Conservapedia, where facts rule. John, if you want to throw in deeply false ideas (like the idea that a civil marriage can be between more than two people), they might like you in Wikipedia. In most states, civil unions are exclusively for a man and a woman! CEinhorn 01:23, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- This article doesn't take a strong enough stand on the position that Marriage is between a MAN and a WOMAN. (cf. The New York State Supreme Court's decision to ban gay 'marriages' in 2006. [1])
