Difference between revisions of "Talk:Red Dawn"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The teenagers in the movie resorted to guerilla tactics to defend their homeland. Is it safe to call them a terrorist organization? --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:23, 20 July 2007 (EDT) | The teenagers in the movie resorted to guerilla tactics to defend their homeland. Is it safe to call them a terrorist organization? --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:23, 20 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:It all depends on how you define terrorist. If I remember the movie correctly, they only attack military targets, so I would say no. The only thing they do that is possibly a war crime is kill a POW, and that's understandable under the circumstances.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 18:59, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | :It all depends on how you define terrorist. If I remember the movie correctly, they only attack military targets, so I would say no. The only thing they do that is possibly a war crime is kill a POW, and that's understandable under the circumstances.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 18:59, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Whoops, I forgot the bombing of the "Soviet-American Friendship Center". That does come closer to the line, but personnally, I wouldn't call it a terrorist act. It's not exactly a military target, but the only people that would be in a place like that are Soviets and collaborators. And bombing it had a direct effect on the occupation. It's not like bombing a marketplace just to prove you can.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 23:17, 22 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:17, March 23, 2008
The teenagers in the movie resorted to guerilla tactics to defend their homeland. Is it safe to call them a terrorist organization? --LiteratiChamp 19:23, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
- It all depends on how you define terrorist. If I remember the movie correctly, they only attack military targets, so I would say no. The only thing they do that is possibly a war crime is kill a POW, and that's understandable under the circumstances.--Frey 18:59, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
- Whoops, I forgot the bombing of the "Soviet-American Friendship Center". That does come closer to the line, but personnally, I wouldn't call it a terrorist act. It's not exactly a military target, but the only people that would be in a place like that are Soviets and collaborators. And bombing it had a direct effect on the occupation. It's not like bombing a marketplace just to prove you can.--Frey 23:17, 22 March 2008 (EDT)