Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added Slavery)
(Look, it really is this easy to parody you...)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
 
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.
 
(add more)
 
(add more)
 +
* [[Northerners]] refusing to acknowledge the evils of integration
  
 
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include:
 
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include:

Revision as of 11:53, March 23, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

  • Northerners refusing to acknowledge the evils of integration

Common expressions of deliberate ignorance include:

  • I'm not aware of that! (without admitting a failure to look)
  • I've never seen that in the New York Times!
  • That's not what it said in my (public school) textbook!
  • Let's talk about something else!
  • I'm not interested in that!

Crime of Deliberate Ignorance

Deliberate ignorance can be a crime. For example, jurors were instructed "to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy."[2]

References

  1. ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility here.
  2. ↑ http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/