Changes

246 bytes added ,  23:21, March 26, 2008
→‎"similar species": Because of similarities?
Line 36: Line 36:  
::::: If you're asking if I'm after the specific reason given in that article, no.  I'll restate it again:  Why do evolutionists think that elephants are related to sea cows and manatees? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:54, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::::: If you're asking if I'm after the specific reason given in that article, no.  I'll restate it again:  Why do evolutionists think that elephants are related to sea cows and manatees? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 18:54, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::: Because of molecular, morphological and biogeographic evidence that supports the hypothesis --[[User:Igor nz|Igor nz]] 19:16, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::: Because of molecular, morphological and biogeographic evidence that supports the hypothesis --[[User:Igor nz|Igor nz]] 19:16, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::::: ''How'' does that evidence support the hypothesis?  Isn't it because of molecular, morphological, and biogegraphical ''similarities''?  If not, then what ''is'' it?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:21, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits