Changes

Line 151: Line 151:  
:''Main article: [[Contradiction]]''
 
:''Main article: [[Contradiction]]''
   −
A contradiction is a statement that contradicts its own terms. [[Aristotle]] famously stated that contradictions cannot exist. In any case of a contradition, some of the premises must be false. A contradiction follows the form:
+
A contradiction is a statement that contradicts its own terms. [[Aristotle]] famously stated that contradictions cannot exist. In any case of a contradition, some of the premises must be false. A contradiction is an argument which includes in its reasoning:
    
*P
 
*P
Line 182: Line 182:     
====Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong====
 
====Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong====
−
: ''Main article: [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong]]''
+
: ''Main article: [[Your theory does not work under my theory, so your theory must be wrong]]'' <!-- note: a Google search for this phrase show that it is exclusive to CreationWiki (well, and now Conservapedia) -->
−
<!-- note: a Google search for this phrase show that it is exclusive to CreationWiki (well, and now Conservapedia) -->
+
 
 
The judgment of a theory by the premises and assumptions of another theory, rather than against its own premises and assumptions. This form of fallacy follows the form:
 
The judgment of a theory by the premises and assumptions of another theory, rather than against its own premises and assumptions. This form of fallacy follows the form:
   Line 195: Line 195:  
:''Main article: [[Straw man fallacy]]
 
:''Main article: [[Straw man fallacy]]
   −
A straw man fallacy occurs by first incorrectly attributing an argument to someone, disproving this argument, then claiming that the person was wrong. Straw man arguments are often found in politics.
+
A straw man fallacy occurs by first incorrectly attributing an argument to someone, disproving this argument, then claiming that the person was wrong. A straw man argument follows the form:
 +
 
 +
*If P then Q
 +
*Person A says P
 +
*Therefore Q
    
Straw man arguments can sometimes be hard to detect, because a valid statement may be used in a distorted fashion. For example:
 
Straw man arguments can sometimes be hard to detect, because a valid statement may be used in a distorted fashion. For example:
Line 205: Line 209:     
===Tautology===
 
===Tautology===
 +
:''Main article: [[tautology]]''
 +
 
A [[tautology]] ([[Greek]] '''ταυτα''' ''tauta'', "these") is an argument that becomes a repetition of a definition. Literally it means "the study of this" or "the study of these." Such an argument, or statement, can prove nothing beyond itself and is useless as a premise.
 
A [[tautology]] ([[Greek]] '''ταυτα''' ''tauta'', "these") is an argument that becomes a repetition of a definition. Literally it means "the study of this" or "the study of these." Such an argument, or statement, can prove nothing beyond itself and is useless as a premise.
  
5,580

edits