Fallacies of ambiguity are fallacies which arise from ambiguity in language used.
Fallacies of ambiguity are fallacies which arise from ambiguity in language used.
−
===Equivocation===
+
===Amphiboli===
+
Amphiboli is an ambiguity which arises though loos or awkward phrasing:
−
===Amphiboli===
+
For example: "Save soap and waste paper".
===Composition===
===Composition===
+
The fallacy of composition occurs when the parts of a whole are incorrectly used to describe the whole.
+
+
For example: "Since one of the battleships is ready to deploy, the whole fleet is ready to deploy".
+
+
===Conflation===
+
:''Main article: [[Conflation]]''
+
+
Conflation is the treatment of two different concepts as one.
+
+
For example: "Comparing apples to oranges".
===Division===
===Division===
+
The fallacy of division occurs when it is argued that what is true for the whole must be true for its parts.
+
+
For example: "That company is very important. Since Joe works at that company, he must be very important."
+
+
===Equivocation===
+
Equivocation is the use of word with multiple meanings, and then use a different meaning in the conlcusion than in the premise.
−
===Conflation===
+
For example: "The coach said we should eat light, so take your heavy coat off."
−
[[Conflation]] is the treatment of two different concepts as one. The most common form of conflation informs the proverbial accusation, "You are comparing apples to oranges."