Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
313 bytes added ,  01:33, April 2, 2008
Line 660: Line 660:     
Thus I believe that this section should be deleted or altered so that Conservapedia's tone remains neutral. {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
 
Thus I believe that this section should be deleted or altered so that Conservapedia's tone remains neutral. {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
      
:You do realize that Conservapedia is officially a Christian & Conservative - friendly encyclopedia, and therefore does not strive, like Wikipedia for neutrality? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 18:55, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
 
:You do realize that Conservapedia is officially a Christian & Conservative - friendly encyclopedia, and therefore does not strive, like Wikipedia for neutrality? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 18:55, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
    
::Because I believe there is a difference between conservatism and anti-constitutional thinking. One of the core values of the conservatism is the infallibility of the constitution. I do edit Wikipedia, by the way. Do you have an opinion on the subject, user ₮K? {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
 
::Because I believe there is a difference between conservatism and anti-constitutional thinking. One of the core values of the conservatism is the infallibility of the constitution. I do edit Wikipedia, by the way. Do you have an opinion on the subject, user ₮K? {{unsigned|Adg2011}}
 +
 +
:::I noted that CP does not strive for neutrality, as you suggested it do.  I have no idea where the Constitution and WP references connect.  Happy editing! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</font></sup> 21:33, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu