Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Sloppy writing"
From Conservapedia
(I guess you just don't get it) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Sorry, but it's true.-[[User:ArcturusM|ArcturusM]] 09:56, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | Sorry, but it's true.-[[User:ArcturusM|ArcturusM]] 09:56, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Also, regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Sloppy_writing&curid=63151&diff=428058&oldid=428055 this], don't you agree that relentless creation of stubs, when they could easily be edits to existing articles, is poor writing?-[[User:ArcturusM|ArcturusM]] 09:59, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | :Also, regarding [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Sloppy_writing&curid=63151&diff=428058&oldid=428055 this], don't you agree that relentless creation of stubs, when they could easily be edits to existing articles, is poor writing?-[[User:ArcturusM|ArcturusM]] 09:59, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::You misunderstand the creative process and the entire point of collaboration. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:05, 10 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:05, April 10, 2008
Examples
Some that really need help:
- Permission (seriously?)
- Biological evolution (should be a redirect to Evolution)
- Inerrancy of the Bible (should be a redirect to Bible)
Sorry, but it's true.-ArcturusM 09:56, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
