110
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: − + + + +
→"taking out the trash"
== "taking out the trash" ==
== "taking out the trash" ==
You do know that you just completely confirmed that Conservative was talking about and to Sputnik 1, right?
You do know that you just completely confirmed that Conservative was talking about and to a site Conservapedia is apparently afraid of to the degree of putting its name into the spam filter, right?
But riddle me this: If sysops openly address that satellite in specifically created userspace articles, why is explicitly mentioning it apparently classified as "trash"? --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:07, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
But riddle me this: If sysops openly address that satellite in specifically created userspace articles, why is explicitly mentioning it apparently classified as "trash"? --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:07, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
:Let it go, friend, let it go. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:12, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
:Let it go, friend, let it go. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:12, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
::You tried to [[deceit|deceive]] me and another user when we asked a question, and then you labeled my comments (and those of others) as "trash". I'm sorry, but I don't think that this is a good basis to call someone "friend".
::Also, the combination of "site name in spam filter + attempted to mislead users + wiping out any mention of the name" is basically telling people to most definitely go there. If so much work has been done to deny the existence of a site, then it just has to be extremely interesting.
::But hey, I've seen the extremes you're willing to go to, so I won't bring the site name on this site here. --[[User:MilesM|MilesM]] 20:26, 13 April 2008 (EDT)