Difference between revisions of "Evolution and science"
From Conservapedia
(the theory of evolution is anti-scientific) |
(Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Evolution | | Evolution | ||
| Science | | Science | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | Adherents demonize their critics instead of taking objections seriously | ||
| + | | Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:05, April 17, 2008
Evolution and science have some things in common, but otherwise are in conflict on several points. Darwinists say that the theory of evolution is scientific and that no other theory is worthy of consideration. This in itself is anti-scientific, because science has always progressed by exposing every existing theory to criticism and testing and welcoming any new theory which can explain known phenomena.
Here is a table of Liberal claims about evolution, contrasted with what science actually knows.
| Evolution | Science |
| Adherents demonize their critics instead of taking objections seriously | Scientific theories must withstand scrutiny |
