Changes

That global warning is a myth is your opnion, and maybe of a few others. The article should not be opinioated, especially not the first paragraph. If you have any thing to contribute. Add it to a section called "Controversy". --[[User:Order|Order]] 18 March 1:00(AEST)

That global warning is a myth is your opnion, and maybe of a few others. The article should not be opinioated, especially not the first paragraph. If you have any thing to contribute. Add it to a section called "Controversy". --[[User:Order|Order]] 18 March 1:00(AEST)

I just checked your link. It reports about one Danish scientist. I know, there area few others, but this doesn't invalidate the claim that it ''widely'' accepted. Not sure if you saw the news about the IPCC report. The IPCC somehow represents the mainstream scientific world. But not everybody accepts it, therefore the it says in the article '''widely''' accepted, and not that its true. And is a complete strech to call a theory incorrect when it is widely accepted, especially in the introduction of an article. The article has a section on controversy. If you want, put your information there. --[[User:Order|Order]] 18 March 1:00(AEST)

I just checked your link. It reports about one Danish scientist. I know, there area few others, but this doesn't invalidate the claim that it ''widely'' accepted. Not sure if you saw the news about the IPCC report. The IPCC somehow represents the mainstream scientific world. But not everybody accepts it, therefore the it says in the article that it is '''widely''' accepted, and not that its '''true'''. And is a complete strech to call a theory incorrect when it is widely accepted, especially in the introduction of an article. The article has a section on controversy. If you want, put your information there. --[[User:Order|Order]] 18 March 1:00(AEST)