Difference between revisions of "Evidence"
(Expand (and remove marginally-relevant paragraph)) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Evidence''' is information presented in testimony or | + | '''Evidence''' is a fact or information that is used to support or prove an idea or claim. |
| + | |||
| + | In a [[court]], evidence is presented in the form of testimony or documents that are used to persuade the fact finder ([[judge]] or [[jury]]) to decide the case for one side or the other. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In [[science]], evidence is used to support or [[falsifiable|falsify]] a hypothesis or theory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evidence does not speak for itself, but must be interpreted. | ||
| + | For example, a judge or jury must decide whether a gun found at the scene of a crime (the evidence) supports the prosecutor's claim that the gun's owner was present, or whether the gun got there by other means. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evidence must be able to distinguish between two competing claims. | ||
| + | For example, similarity of living things ([[homology]]) does not necessarily support the [[theory of evolution]] over the [[creationism|creationary viewpoint]] because the same evidence is consistent with both ideas. | ||
| − | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Epistemology]] | *[[Epistemology]] | ||
*[[Knowledge]] | *[[Knowledge]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Legal Terms]] | [[Category:Legal Terms]] | ||
[[category:Philosophy]] | [[category:Philosophy]] | ||
Revision as of 06:54, August 25, 2008
Evidence is a fact or information that is used to support or prove an idea or claim.
In a court, evidence is presented in the form of testimony or documents that are used to persuade the fact finder (judge or jury) to decide the case for one side or the other.
In science, evidence is used to support or falsify a hypothesis or theory.
Evidence does not speak for itself, but must be interpreted. For example, a judge or jury must decide whether a gun found at the scene of a crime (the evidence) supports the prosecutor's claim that the gun's owner was present, or whether the gun got there by other means.
Evidence must be able to distinguish between two competing claims. For example, similarity of living things (homology) does not necessarily support the theory of evolution over the creationary viewpoint because the same evidence is consistent with both ideas.