Difference between revisions of "Sprint/United Management Company v. Ellen Mendelsohn"
From Conservapedia
m (br) |
DavidB4-bot (Talk | contribs) (→References: clean up & uniformity) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
Latest revision as of 19:38, July 13, 2016
This case presents a question to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning employment discrimination:[1]
- Should an age discrimination plaintiff have been allowed to introduce the testimony of co-workers who also claimed the employer used age as a factor in implementing a reduction in force?
References
- ↑ Sprint/United Management Co v. Mendelsohn, No. 06-1221. Certiorari granted June 11, 2007. Ruling below: 466 F.3d 1223 (10th Cir. 2006).
