Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Separate Life"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Wow. This thing makes a lot of weird arguments. It is simple to see that this person is more concerned with taking an existing moral and supporting it with evidence for BIOLOGICAL, not MORAL seperation. | Wow. This thing makes a lot of weird arguments. It is simple to see that this person is more concerned with taking an existing moral and supporting it with evidence for BIOLOGICAL, not MORAL seperation. | ||
| + | :No, Ikrase, it is you who are making the weird arguments in your attempts to justify the killing of an unborn child, and it is that work of evil that will not go unpunished, and not the writer of an essay which you had no business editing without his permission. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 19:53, 18 May 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:53, May 18, 2008
Ay caramba!
Deep breath there, fella. Hold it for three, two..... :P --Robledo 20:16, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
Are there ppl that actually don't know all of this?Aknot 20:18, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
This is the kind of stuff we want to see on Conservapedia. Original work essays. Keep up the good work! DanH 21:58, 19 May 2007 (EDT)
THIS WORK OF EVIL WILL NOT GO UNPUNISHED
Wow. This thing makes a lot of weird arguments. It is simple to see that this person is more concerned with taking an existing moral and supporting it with evidence for BIOLOGICAL, not MORAL seperation.
- No, Ikrase, it is you who are making the weird arguments in your attempts to justify the killing of an unborn child, and it is that work of evil that will not go unpunished, and not the writer of an essay which you had no business editing without his permission. Karajou 19:53, 18 May 2008 (EDT)