Changes

265 bytes removed ,  11:43, May 23, 2008
Funding is unrelated to whether a study is correct - see Science and motivation
Line 27: Line 27:     
"Clinging to alarmist scenarios for which there is no evidence, is simply exploitation of public gullibility." <ref>[http://www.iop.org/activity/groups/professional/emg/Newsletter/file_21729.doc The Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], [[Richard Lindzen|Richard S. Lindzen]], ''Institute of Physics'', April 2007, page 11</ref>
 
"Clinging to alarmist scenarios for which there is no evidence, is simply exploitation of public gullibility." <ref>[http://www.iop.org/activity/groups/professional/emg/Newsletter/file_21729.doc The Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], [[Richard Lindzen|Richard S. Lindzen]], ''Institute of Physics'', April 2007, page 11</ref>
−
  −
Examination of the funding behind scientific studies which downplay the reality and potential dangers of global warming shows that large oil companies are the benefactors. This calls into question the legitimacy of such studies. (CBC - Fifth Estate, October 2007)
      
==The Modern Warm Period==
 
==The Modern Warm Period==
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits