Changes

720 bytes removed ,  19:57, May 24, 2008
no edit summary
Line 120: Line 120:  
In any case, don't post to my talk page anymore.  You and your rhetoric are not welcome there. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:45, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
 
In any case, don't post to my talk page anymore.  You and your rhetoric are not welcome there. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:45, 23 May 2008 (EDT)
   −
In America, 'rights', constitutional or otherwise, are determined by the laws of the land.  You also seem to misunderstand the concept that a law can be unconstitutional even if a vast majority of the electorate voted in favor of it.  The judges in California decided the law banning gay marriages did not pass constitutional muster, therefore it does not matter what percentage of the population supported it.  Since you seem to like your slippery slope argument, would you be willing to argue that heterosexuals should give up the right to marry since the homosexuals may want to have the same right?  As far as the marriage rights of other countries are concerned, we are just talking about America, or so I thought.
      
==Comments deleted from Jinxmchue's talk page posted here for posterity==
 
==Comments deleted from Jinxmchue's talk page posted here for posterity==
300

edits