Difference between revisions of "Indignation"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(striking an indignant pose -- feathers in full ruffle -- is not an answer to a serious charge)
 
m (See also Darwin and eugenics)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Benjamin Wiker]] says that "striking an indignant pose -- feathers in full ruffle -- is not an answer to ... a serious charge." [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26346]
 
[[Benjamin Wiker]] says that "striking an indignant pose -- feathers in full ruffle -- is not an answer to ... a serious charge." [http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26346]
 +
 +
See also:
 +
*[[Darwin and eugenics]]

Revision as of 11:59, May 24, 2008

Benjamin Wiker says that "striking an indignant pose -- feathers in full ruffle -- is not an answer to ... a serious charge." [1]

See also: