Difference between revisions of "Essay:Evolution and intelligent design"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Johnson only said one of these)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|Theory of evolution}}
 
The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]
 
The [[theory of evolution]] is merely a religion that serves to discredit the [[Intelligent Designer]] Himself. [http://www.allaboutscience.org/intelligent-design.htm]
  

Revision as of 01:51, October 5, 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::Theory of evolution|Theory of evolution]]. (Discuss)

The theory of evolution is merely a religion that serves to discredit the Intelligent Designer Himself. [1]

Phillip E. Johnson told NOVA:

The theory of evolution may be true in a sense, but it may require the participation of an intelligent cause. That is the basic intelligent-design proposition—that unintelligent causes by themselves can't do the whole job. That doesn't say that everything was created all at once. [2]

See also