Difference between revisions of "Talk:BBC News"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring sourve if it allows this sort of [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6464277.stm content]and [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4879672.stm this.]{{unsigned|republican}}
+
Should the BBC be allowed as a referring source if it allows this sort of [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6464277.stm content]and [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4879672.stm this.]{{unsigned|republican}}
  
 
:...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I am wondering about [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_evolution&action=history here] Conservative and myself seem to be in a [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Conservative#CP:AID quandry]what do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source?  ">[[User:republican|'''republican''']]

Revision as of 01:35, March 19, 2007

Should the BBC be allowed as a referring source if it allows this sort of contentand this.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by republican (talk)

...And what do those articles have to do with it being used as a reliable source? That's news; it's reporting on studies. And it's made up of tens of thousands of people, so the whole corporation can't be blamed for one reporters articles. --Hojimachongtalk 21:29, 18 March 2007 (EDT)

I am wondering about here Conservative and myself seem to be in a quandrywhat do you think? As a reference if this was reverted by another sysopts should the BBC no longer be taken as a source? ">republican