User talk:Wandering

Useful links

• How to edit a wiki
• CP Commandments
• CP Guidelines
• Style Manual
• Editing Etiquette
• How to create and maintain high-quality articles
• Report Problems
• List of Templates

Welcome!

Hello, Wandering, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Wandering!

User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 01:57, 15 May 2008 (EDT)

Reversion

"Wandering", please learn the difference between "little" and "none", per the Theory of Relativity. Thanks.--Aschlafly 19:05, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

Uh, exactly what more recognition is needed than a prize given by the Nobel committee?Wandering 19:15, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

Wandering, if I see you deleting information again to advance your personal ideology, then I'm blocking your account. Got it? As to Nobel Prizes, I'm not going to waste time explaining this to you, but look up how many have been given for quantum mechanics.--Aschlafly 19:19, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

I don't have a personal ideology regarding the theory of relativity, but it's rather ridiculous to say that it receives little recognition when a prize was awarded and there's a whole section on the Nobel Prize website about relativity, as linked by that very article. If we're going to say that little recognition is given in comparison to the attention and awards given to other sciences, then that's fine, but saying "little" without context flies in the face of the evidence (which I just stated). Wandering 19:37, 29 May 2008 (EDT)

Warning

"Wandering", you apparently deleted information from professor values beyond a duplicate reference. Unless you have an explanation, your account is progressing towards being blocked. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 07:45, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

Final warning: "Wandering", I'm tiring of reverting your edits. If I have to review and revert more edits by you in the absence of substantive contributions to this project, then I will likely block your account.--Aschlafly 07:51, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

You don't have to be tired of reverting my edits because there's no need to revert them. You reverted a reference to Obama's support for abstinence education as "liberal bias", which makes no sense. Let me quote directly for you:

“

And part of that, I think, should be a strong education component and I think abstinence education is important. I also think that contraception is important; I also think that treatment is important; I also think that we have to do more to make antiviral drugs available to people who are in extreme poverty

”

I'm not sure why you keep removing that, because it is a clear statement by him that he supports abstinence as part of sex education.

I made three edits to Professor values, none of which removed information. 1 and 2 added in context information (it was an online survey which the polled chose to take, and which I believe they might even have needed to register in order to do so), while in the edit you mentioned, I removed a duplicate reference which seems to have nothing to do with atheism. I have no idea where you got the idea that I deleted information, and frankly I'm a little bewildered. Wandering 10:26, 8 June 2008 (EDT)

Hello?