Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rat"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Would a section on Rats In Popular Culture be good I could gladly add that.--[[User:Jedisqrl|Jedisqrl]] 15:06, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | Would a section on Rats In Popular Culture be good I could gladly add that.--[[User:Jedisqrl|Jedisqrl]] 15:06, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
:If it is factual and encyclopedic, please go ahead. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 15:07, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | :If it is factual and encyclopedic, please go ahead. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 15:07, 14 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Alberta== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it worth noting that the Canadian province of Alberta has no rats? [[User:HDCase|HDCase]] 15:31, 14 November 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:31, November 14, 2008
wow
um wikipedia has alot better info on rats, this entry is a direct controdiction to conservapedia's moto: an enclopedia I can trust, all I know is that a rat is an animal it lives on every continent but antarctica and that people consider it a pest. wow if that's all there is to Zoology then anybody can be it
- Feel free to add any factual information you want to. Bohdan 00:30, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Would a section on Rats In Popular Culture be good I could gladly add that.--Jedisqrl 15:06, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
- If it is factual and encyclopedic, please go ahead. HenryS 15:07, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Alberta
Is it worth noting that the Canadian province of Alberta has no rats? HDCase 15:31, 14 November 2008 (EST)