Difference between revisions of "User talk:Godlives"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Thanks for the tip. I have only just stumbled across this site and am absolutely flabbergasted. They criticise Wikipedia but on that site if there is a mistake it can be corrected. On this site, many important pages are just locked so the obvious mistakes cannot be corrected. [[User:Godlives|Godlives]] 07:32, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | Thanks for the tip. I have only just stumbled across this site and am absolutely flabbergasted. They criticise Wikipedia but on that site if there is a mistake it can be corrected. On this site, many important pages are just locked so the obvious mistakes cannot be corrected. [[User:Godlives|Godlives]] 07:32, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Yup== | ||
| + | Look at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia| This]] as compared to [[Examples of Bias in Conservapedia| This!]] [[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 07:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:38, March 19, 2007
While the David Hicks item is true, they'll delete it since it' source to wikipedia. Source it to a news org and it should be fine. Crackertalk 07:27, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for the tip. I have only just stumbled across this site and am absolutely flabbergasted. They criticise Wikipedia but on that site if there is a mistake it can be corrected. On this site, many important pages are just locked so the obvious mistakes cannot be corrected. Godlives 07:32, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
Yup
Look at This as compared to This! Crackertalk 07:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)