Difference between revisions of "Moon"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Removed an opinion. Opinions do not count as encycolpedic content.)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Moon''' orbits the [[Earth]].  Unlike most planets, Earth has only one moon and it has several striking characteristics that only be described as artistic in design:   
+
The '''Moon''' orbits the [[Earth]].  Unlike most planets, Earth has only one moon and it has several striking characteristics:   
  
 
1.  Throughout man's existence, the Moon has had the same size as the [[Sun]] when viewed from Earth.  This creates a beautiful symmetry and permits phenomenal eclipses to occur.  The odds of that symmetry occurring by chance are very small.  That symmetry will not last forever. {{fact}}
 
1.  Throughout man's existence, the Moon has had the same size as the [[Sun]] when viewed from Earth.  This creates a beautiful symmetry and permits phenomenal eclipses to occur.  The odds of that symmetry occurring by chance are very small.  That symmetry will not last forever. {{fact}}
  
2.  The Moon presents the same side to Earth at all times, even though the Moon revolves around the Earth.  That requires the rotation of the Moon to be timed precisely to offset the separate effects of the revolution around Earth.  This has an awesome artistic or design effect without any plausible physical reason. {{fact}}
+
2.  The Moon presents the same side to Earth at all times, even though the Moon revolves around the Earth.  That requires the rotation of the Moon to be timed precisely to offset the separate effects of the revolution around Earth. Physicists explain this phenomenon by invoking [[tidal locking]]; tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby creating a drag on the rotation of the Moon until its same face always presents to the Earth.  It was once believed that the planet [[Mercury]] had a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. In fact, Mercury's tidal locking is incomplete; it does not always present the same face to the sun, but rather switches the side that it presents to the sun every full revolution. 
  
Skeptics sought to explain this remarkable phenomenon by saying that tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby locking in the rotation of the Moon so that its same face always presents to the Earth.  They asserted that the planet [[Mercury]] has a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. {{fact}}
+
Current tidal forces exerted by the Earth on the Moon cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape, though accounting for greater tidal forces in the past may explain this discrepancy.<ref>http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM</ref>
 
+
But this explanation was ultimately proven wrong.<ref>http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM</ref>
+
Mercury does not always present the same face to the sun as claimed, and instead switches the side that it presents to the sun every full revolution.  As to the Moon, the tidal forces on the Earth cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape.  The cause of the bulge on the Moon to lock in its rotation remains a mystery to those who reject [[Intelligent Design]].
+
  
 
3.  The Moon's surface lacks the abundant [[iron]] that permeates the Earth, thereby proving that the Moon did not come from the Earth.  This deficiency of iron on the Moon disproved the primary theory that the Moon must have originated by breaking off from the Earth.  There is no plausible non-creation theory of origin for the Moon at this time. {{fact}}
 
3.  The Moon's surface lacks the abundant [[iron]] that permeates the Earth, thereby proving that the Moon did not come from the Earth.  This deficiency of iron on the Moon disproved the primary theory that the Moon must have originated by breaking off from the Earth.  There is no plausible non-creation theory of origin for the Moon at this time. {{fact}}
  
4.  The Moon is currently receding from the Earth at less than 6 inches per year. The Moon could never have been closer than about 150,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces. If the rate of recession is assumed to have averaged about 6 inches per year, the Moon's present distance of about 250,000 miles implies a young age for the Moon of no more than one billion years.  Under the non-creationist claim that the Moon somehow broke away from the Earth, the Moon's rate of recession must have been faster in the past, and thus the Moon would have been only 150,000 miles from the Earth far more recently than one billion years ago. This contradicts the claim of non-creationists that the Moon and Earth are somehow several billions of years old. {{fact}}
+
4.  The Moon is currently receding from the Earth at less than 6 inches per year. The Moon could never have been closer than about 11,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces. If the rate of recession is assumed to have averaged about 6 inches per year, the Moon's present distance of about 250,000 miles implies an age for the Moon of no more than 2.6 billion years.  However, the tidal forces between Earth and Moon are not constant, and so simply extrapolating from the current rate of change is not strictly valid.
  
 
5.  Our solar system is one of the few that has only one star.{{fact}}  
 
5.  Our solar system is one of the few that has only one star.{{fact}}  

Revision as of 12:49, March 19, 2007

The Moon orbits the Earth. Unlike most planets, Earth has only one moon and it has several striking characteristics:

1. Throughout man's existence, the Moon has had the same size as the Sun when viewed from Earth. This creates a beautiful symmetry and permits phenomenal eclipses to occur. The odds of that symmetry occurring by chance are very small. That symmetry will not last forever.[Citation Needed]

2. The Moon presents the same side to Earth at all times, even though the Moon revolves around the Earth. That requires the rotation of the Moon to be timed precisely to offset the separate effects of the revolution around Earth. Physicists explain this phenomenon by invoking tidal locking; tidal forces on Earth caused a bulge on the Moon, thereby creating a drag on the rotation of the Moon until its same face always presents to the Earth. It was once believed that the planet Mercury had a similar locked rotation due to gravitational forces from the sun, such that the same side of Mercury always faces the sun. In fact, Mercury's tidal locking is incomplete; it does not always present the same face to the sun, but rather switches the side that it presents to the sun every full revolution.

Current tidal forces exerted by the Earth on the Moon cannot account fully for its bulge or egg shape, though accounting for greater tidal forces in the past may explain this discrepancy.[1]

3. The Moon's surface lacks the abundant iron that permeates the Earth, thereby proving that the Moon did not come from the Earth. This deficiency of iron on the Moon disproved the primary theory that the Moon must have originated by breaking off from the Earth. There is no plausible non-creation theory of origin for the Moon at this time.[Citation Needed]

4. The Moon is currently receding from the Earth at less than 6 inches per year. The Moon could never have been closer than about 11,000 miles or it would have been broken up by tidal forces. If the rate of recession is assumed to have averaged about 6 inches per year, the Moon's present distance of about 250,000 miles implies an age for the Moon of no more than 2.6 billion years. However, the tidal forces between Earth and Moon are not constant, and so simply extrapolating from the current rate of change is not strictly valid.

5. Our solar system is one of the few that has only one star.[Citation Needed]


See also

Notes and References

  1. http://physics.fortlewis.edu/Astronomy/astronomy%20today/CHAISSON/AT308/HTML/AT30803.HTM