2,732
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
no edit summary
:It is impossible to be convinced by the evidence that there is no God, the only option is to be convinced there is. The very definition of God is that He is outside science. Evolutionism is a worldview whether it's correct or incorrect, because it's how certain people view the world. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 11:04, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:It is impossible to be convinced by the evidence that there is no God, the only option is to be convinced there is. The very definition of God is that He is outside science. Evolutionism is a worldview whether it's correct or incorrect, because it's how certain people view the world. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 11:04, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::Shocking, truly shocking. You don't have to be an atheist to know that evolution is fact. ''Exemplum gratis'': me. Can you prove otherwise, or are you going to continue to insult us all? And if you are, will you get better arguments then "the only option is to be convinced there is"? Oh, and I wholeheartedly agree that God is outside science. So doesn't that mean that the two are compatible? That the two must never conflict?--[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 11:19, 19 March 2007 (EDT)