Changes

98 bytes added ,  17:33, March 19, 2007
Good article
Line 67: Line 67:  
* Readers will remind you of controversy even if you don't include it.<br />
 
* Readers will remind you of controversy even if you don't include it.<br />
 
Let us err on the side of conservatism rather on the side of rumor-mongering. If our article is viewed with respect as Father Jonathan's seems to be, instead of the reactions to groupthink found at Wikipedia, we will have accomplished a great deal. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 12:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 
Let us err on the side of conservatism rather on the side of rumor-mongering. If our article is viewed with respect as Father Jonathan's seems to be, instead of the reactions to groupthink found at Wikipedia, we will have accomplished a great deal. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 12:17, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Good article ==
 +
 +
Gotta say the article as it currently stands is one of the better ones here.
1,660

edits