Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
→Request to come back: A statement of site policy
Amen, good sir. I am a Catholic, and a Progressive one at that, and I cannot understand why others who claim to be Christians feel that it is their prerogative to declare whether my views on Jesus and his teachings are valid or not. I admire your stance. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 00:04, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
Amen, good sir. I am a Catholic, and a Progressive one at that, and I cannot understand why others who claim to be Christians feel that it is their prerogative to declare whether my views on Jesus and his teachings are valid or not. I admire your stance. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 00:04, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
: I accept that Catholics can be Christians, and I think I disagree with Ultimahero on that, but what I don't accept is what is implied in your comment, that we should accept as Christian anyone who claims that label regardless of whether their beliefs are consistent with biblical teaching. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:10, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
: I accept that Catholics can be Christians, and I think I disagree with Ultimahero on that, but what I don't accept is what is implied in your comment, that we should accept as Christian anyone who claims that label regardless of whether their beliefs are consistent with biblical teaching. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 03:10, 25 June 2008 (EDT)
::I think you should mind your own business, Philip. It is directly contrary to the purpose of our site to provoke conflicts among different denominations of Christianity. Such activity is non-encyclopedic and can easily lead to falsehoods rather than the truth. Bickering between different religions without any clear connection to the purpose of our site has no legitimate role on Conservapedia. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 08:27, 25 June 2008 (EDT)