768
edits
Changes
It does not concern the scientific theory
:::I'm simply trying to include all the viewpoints. If it can be worded better, let me know how. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 12:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::I'm simply trying to include all the viewpoints. If it can be worded better, let me know how. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 12:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
== It does not concern the scientific theory ==
Neither does the article linked to. And I continue to object strongly to this article. This is merely an attempt to strengthen the POV that evolution is both the foundation and the cause of a belief system. An attempt to make evolution a religion... which, of course, leads to a whole bunch of constitutional questions. I also find it amusing that the majority of the "controversy" section is the creationist response and that the pro-science sites at the bottom of the page all have their "Creationwiki" responses while the anti-science sites lack scientific responses. This article is a sham, top to bottom, and is only fit for deletion. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 13:40, 21 March 2007 (EDT)