Difference between revisions of "User talk:TrueValues"
(→Kangaroo Edits: forgot sig) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
What made you revert my change (485296) in the first place?--[[User:Rspeed|Rspeed]] 19:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | What made you revert my change (485296) in the first place?--[[User:Rspeed|Rspeed]] 19:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | Sir/Ma'am: Why is it "liberal distortion" to request references that are required by the commandments of this encyclopedia? My citation request at the 'Liberal Creep' article was explicitly permitted by the guidelines so why does the request "make it seem untruthful"? I'm sure that if the assertion is truthful, the person asserting such truthfulness would have no problem providing the reference thus ensuring Conservapedia remains a trustworthy source. Wouldn't you agree?--[[User:Jimmy|Jimmy]] 20:32, 1 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:32, July 2, 2008
Tell me what the liberal drivel is about winning a MacArthur Fellowship or being elected in the US National Academy of Sciences? Otherwise please stop removing my entries.--Argon 20:41, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Please don't remove cited and relevant material. Thanks, HenryS 20:50, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the consideration. --Argon 20:56, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Kangaroo Edits
What made you revert my change (485296) in the first place?--Rspeed 19:20, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
References
Sir/Ma'am: Why is it "liberal distortion" to request references that are required by the commandments of this encyclopedia? My citation request at the 'Liberal Creep' article was explicitly permitted by the guidelines so why does the request "make it seem untruthful"? I'm sure that if the assertion is truthful, the person asserting such truthfulness would have no problem providing the reference thus ensuring Conservapedia remains a trustworthy source. Wouldn't you agree?--Jimmy 20:32, 1 July 2008 (EDT)
