Difference between revisions of "Talk:Integral"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.
+
This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--[[User:Mathoreilly|Mathoreilly]] 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 17:40, July 2, 2008

This page is in need of serious revision. Someone who isn't already familiar with integral calculus would find this section extremely opaque. Someone with a solid understanding of calculus should come in and explain, in clearer language, the geometric meaning behind the integral and provide a picture of a Riemann sum. I can't do everything here.--Mathoreilly 13:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)