768
edits
Changes
→Gravitationism, Electricityism, Wheelism
::"Believe"? ;-) <-- That's what I mean by facetious. Not the terms themselves, the way he did it and is not trying to be constructive. A better edit would be adding a quote or two from an evolutionist website, with a source. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:33, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::"Believe"? ;-) <-- That's what I mean by facetious. Not the terms themselves, the way he did it and is not trying to be constructive. A better edit would be adding a quote or two from an evolutionist website, with a source. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:33, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::*Exactly! I don't ''believe'' in those things. Hence, believing them all the same way. [[User:Myk|Myk]] 21:15, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::Ymmotrojam, if you want to be constructive you will forget this silly article all together. As has been pointed out it is just a straw man argument. If you want to debate creation and evolution I would applaud that. What you have chosen to do, however, is indulge in what is effectively a name-calling exercise. This article is not a serious entry in an encyclopedic work. It's a piece of cheap propaganda. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
::Ymmotrojam, if you want to be constructive you will forget this silly article all together. As has been pointed out it is just a straw man argument. If you want to debate creation and evolution I would applaud that. What you have chosen to do, however, is indulge in what is effectively a name-calling exercise. This article is not a serious entry in an encyclopedic work. It's a piece of cheap propaganda. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:34, 19 March 2007 (EDT)