Difference between revisions of "Well-Ordering Theorem"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(wikify)
(That wasn't even a proper sentence, but I think this is what the author had in mind.)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
''Every set can be well-ordered''.
 
''Every set can be well-ordered''.
 
</blockquote>
 
</blockquote>
−
This result surprised [[mathematician]]s everywhere.  Because the Well-Ordering Theorem is a direct consequence of the [[Axiom of Choice]], and no well-ordering relation has ever been explicitly constructed for [[uncountable set]]s, therefore many mathematicians have rejected the Axiom of Choice.
+
This result surprised [[mathematician]]s everywhere.  The Well-Ordering Theorem is equivalent of the [[Axiom of Choice]], and no well-ordering relation has ever been explicitly constructed for [[uncountable set]]s. Thus, the mathematicians who reject the Axiom of Choice also reject this theorem.
 
[[Category: set theory]]
 
[[Category: set theory]]

Revision as of 20:35, December 2, 2008

The Well-Ordering Theorem was proved by Zermelos in 1904, and it states:

Every set can be well-ordered.

This result surprised mathematicians everywhere. The Well-Ordering Theorem is equivalent of the Axiom of Choice, and no well-ordering relation has ever been explicitly constructed for uncountable sets. Thus, the mathematicians who reject the Axiom of Choice also reject this theorem.