Difference between revisions of "Talk:John Howard"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:I don't have time to sift through every claim in the article to check for accuracy, so I've reduced it to a stub until someone with knowledge of the subject can restore it to a more sensible state. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:I don't have time to sift through every claim in the article to check for accuracy, so I've reduced it to a stub until someone with knowledge of the subject can restore it to a more sensible state. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 07:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
  
−
 
+
:It's a very funny article, nonetheless! [[User:Karalius Nyder|Karalius Nyder]] 22:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
  
 
___________________________________________________________________________________
 
___________________________________________________________________________________

Revision as of 02:22, March 21, 2007

its kinda sad to think that some poor kid might take this seriously. But it does provide genuine food for thought the whol Liberal vs liberal thing

I don't have time to sift through every claim in the article to check for accuracy, so I've reduced it to a stub until someone with knowledge of the subject can restore it to a more sensible state. Tsumetai 07:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
It's a very funny article, nonetheless! Karalius Nyder 22:22, 20 March 2007 (EDT)

___________________________________________________________________________________

As both a long-term voter for the Liberal Party of Australia, a Catholic, and a partial contributer to the entry on John Howard, I do not believe that there is too much in this particular entry which cannot be shown to be based on truth as an Australian would define truth. The concept of truth, be it in regard to one's belief in a God or, at the other end of the specturm, belief in mother Gaia is not always as easily defined as one might imagine. Australians will remember a recent rather unkind qote, from whom I cannot remember, which described John Howard thus:

"He may be a rodent, but he is OUR rodent!"

That is truth as much as John Howard being in the Labor Party is truth.

I would like John Howard to see this article so that he may confirm it's contents, for although he may be perceived by many as a rodent, Prime Minister Howard would, I am sure, not want to change a single line of this entry about him. Numbat 19:57, 20 March 2007 (WDT)