nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, Administrators
22,417
edits
Changes
Conservapedia:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 04:16, October 3, 2008
, 04:16, October 3, 2008→Proposed for featuring
:*Disagree. Unimportant topic of interest mostly to liberals. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Unimportant topic of interest mostly to liberals. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Important topic, but not described correctly. Article contains at least one contradiction ("reader response" both wrong and right). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Important topic, but not described correctly. Article contains at least one contradiction ("reader response" both wrong and right). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:40, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
:*Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:14, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
:*Agree. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 09:14, 26 August 2008 (EDT) Fixed red links and improved. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 00:16, 3 October 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. I'm not qualified to judge it's accuracy, but it is too obscure and not written at a suitable level. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. I'm not qualified to judge it's accuracy, but it is too obscure and not written at a suitable level. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 10:24, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Not long enough, too many red links, not nearly enough images that explain the text, I just didn't understand what was going on in that article. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
:*Disagree. Not long enough, too many red links, not nearly enough images that explain the text, I just didn't understand what was going on in that article. [[User:JY23|JY23]] 21:31, 28 September 2008 (EDT)