Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abner Louima"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply)
(it's not fraud, for example?)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
::It is aggravated assault. The same would be said if he was penetrated by a knife.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt|  ]]</sup> 17:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
 
::It is aggravated assault. The same would be said if he was penetrated by a knife.--'''<font color="#6698FF">J</font><font color="#E41B17">p</font><font color="#F88017">a</font><font color="#347C17">t</font><font color="#A74AC7">t</font>'''<sup>[[User:Jpatt|  ]]</sup> 17:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
::Jpatt- that's nonsense.  Granted, the officer did not place his penis in Louima's anus or mouth, or vice-versa, but it's not exactly the same as a heavy beating, is it?  Penetration of any bodily orifice under duress is a sexual assault.  [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 17:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:03, October 22, 2008

Rectum penetrated with a broomstick is not sexual assault. --Jpatt 16:51, 22 October 2008 (EDT)

What would you classify it as? In NYC it was viewed as a form of prison rape, but committed by the officer instead of an inmate. --DinsdaleP 16:53, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
It is aggravated assault. The same would be said if he was penetrated by a knife.--Jpatt 17:02, 22 October 2008 (EDT)


Jpatt- that's nonsense. Granted, the officer did not place his penis in Louima's anus or mouth, or vice-versa, but it's not exactly the same as a heavy beating, is it? Penetration of any bodily orifice under duress is a sexual assault. BenHur 17:03, 22 October 2008 (EDT)