Changes

Line 668: Line 668:  
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 
::::Not persecution, Corry. Discussion. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 17:08, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 
:::::The argument is that if Obama were Muslim that would be a reason not to vote for him.  I don't know what else to call that.  Also, I would recommend you don't Google what AshleyB advised you to Google on your talk page.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 17:10, 10 November 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::: This suggestion by ASchlafly is worse than weak, it's nonsensical.  ASchlalfy talks about correlation being indicative of causation.  How can there be any '''causation'''?  In order for there to be causation the Muslim voters would have to have ''known'' that Obama was a Muslim.  Is there some vast secret conspiracy going on?  Have the Muslim voters been given contacted and given the secret "Obama is a Muslim" information by the Obama campaign?  Are the rest of us being kept in the dark?  How many Muslim voters are we talking about?  This is just plain silly.--[[User:HGridley|HGridley]] 17:14, 10 November 2008 (EST)
9

edits