Changes

298 bytes added ,  23:26, March 21, 2007
Line 44: Line 44:     
== Deletion ==
 
== Deletion ==
 +
Evolutionism doesn't coincide with the Scientific Theory of Evolution, if it exists at all.  The presentation of evolution as being opposed to the existence of god is incorrect.  A scientist doesn't pursue evolution with the assumption that god does not exist.  Instead, the supernatural and natural are kept separate in the scientific reasoning process.  The deletion of the Scientific Theory of Evolution article is offensive to scientists and supporters of evolution (the vast majority of the world's population).  Please restore this article. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]] 18:06, 21 March 2007 (CST)
   −
Evolutionism doesn't coincide with the Scientific Theory of Evolution, if it exists at all. The presentation of evolution as being opposed to the existence of god is incorrect.  A scientist doesn't pursue evolution with the assumption that god does not exist.  Instead, the supernatural and natural are kept separate in the scientific reasoning process. The deletion of the Scientific Theory of Evolution article is offensive to scientists and supporters of evolution (the vast majority of the world's population).  Please restore this article. --[[User:Charliemc86|Charliemc86]] 18:06, 21 March 2007 (CST)
+
:Nowhere does the article say the thing you are suggesting, to my knowledge. Please show some examples of what you mean and it can maybe be reworded. The Evolutionism article is important because it brings out some cultural perspectives. --[[User:Ymmotrojam|Ymmotrojam]] 19:26, 21 March 2007 (EDT)