1,631
edits
Changes
Talk:Scientific Theory of Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 01:02, March 22, 2007
, 01:02, March 22, 2007Redundant?
:::By all means, be my guest :-). So long as we don't invoke the wrath of the admins, more clarity = good. I really appreciate it. Rockin'-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
:::By all means, be my guest :-). So long as we don't invoke the wrath of the admins, more clarity = good. I really appreciate it. Rockin'-[[User:AmesG|AmesG]] 20:45, 21 March 2007 (EDT)
==Isn't this kind of redundant==
I'll be the first to admit that there is good material on this page, but do we really need another page on evolution. I think that we should try to keep conservapedia as consise as possible. Maybe we could try to merge it with the other one. --[[User:BenjaminS|BenjaminS]] 21:02, 21 March 2007 (EDT)